Wingnut of the Day
I used to do wingnut roundups almost every weekend, but wading through all that dumbassery made me fear for civilization itself. It also hurt my head. I will now wade back in.
One of the best sources of pure, Grade A wingnuttery is the American Thinker. I was reminded of this yesterday when I came across the following over at Sadly, No!
In a statistical study entitled “Reproduction and the Carbon Legacies of Individuals,” published in Global Environmental Change by Murtaugh and Shlax of Oregon State University, and again published here, the authors propose that the potential savings from reduced reproduction rates among humans are some 20 times more effective than the savings wrought by life style changes.
Sorta makes sense if you think about it.
It is clear that the authors follow the Liberal mantra of the ends justify the means. If we can reduce carbon emissions by reducing the number of children, then we should do it, they gloat. It appears that carbon reductions trump even “life” itself.
I practice my gloating in front of the mirror.
Indeed, the authors purposely fail to mention that their proposal puts humanity on a fast-tack extinction curve, as reproduction rates fall below population replacement rates. Surely, as statisticians they know this well. Within a few generations, there wouldn’t be any one around to measure, least wise care, about carbon emissions. We would all be dead.
But golly, we would save the planet! Just goes to show you, Liberals are all about death and destruction. They absolutely live for it!
Not only is Barack Hussein Obama coming to get your guns, he’s coming to get your babies!
It is the video that accompanies this rain of shit that gives us our wingnut of the day. Sadly, No! had to fix the video though. Stinquers, I present Dr. Craig Idso.
Now that’s some serious wingnuttin’.