Sarah Palin Eats Babies

“Blood libel obviously means being falsely accused of having blood on your hands. In this case, that’s exactly what was going on,” she said [to Sean Hannity], adding later, “Just two days before an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal had that term in its title. And that term has been used for eons.” [CNN]

11 Comments

Anybody have time to look up the WSJ article for the content off the article?

@Tommmcatt is with Karin Marie on This One: I actually quoted the article itself in one of the Long Threads that Sunday. It was by Krauthammer.

@nojo: Really? I’d assumed it was this one by Instapundit.

@mellbell: Same article, but I got the author wrong.

Okay, two more soundbites that annoy me…

“The graphic that was used was crosshairs. That’s not original. Democrats have been using them for years.”

The only Lefty example I’ve seen that’s getting play features archery targets.

“The contract graphic artist did take it down and I don’t think that was inappropriate.”

The freelancer (1) had access to the SarahPAC website, and (2) removed the image on a Saturday? Hey, I work weekends, but I’m not in a hurry to handle emergency requests.

Someone tell her that’s not what ‘blood libel’ means. I’m too tired.

tj/mellbell’s boyfriend Gary Johnson was scheduled to speak at a Tea Party rally this morning.

http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Local%20News/Local-news-in-brief-Jan–16–2011

@redmanlaw: My real boyfriend might have something to say about that.

If anyone would like to tell me where that “Who’s to Blame” ad with Keef goes, I’ll be more than happy to zap it.

Add a Comment
Please log in to post a comment