Our Source Was The N.Y. Times
Black Eagle, during the Easter Egg Roll, said this:
President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons, even in self defense.
[snippety snip]
…The United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons, or launched a crippling cyberattack. Those threats, he argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options” — a combination of old and newly designed conventional weapons. “I’m going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure,” Mr. Obama said during the interview in the Oval Office.
Well.
Haven’t looked at The Corner yet, but I’m guessing they’d be somewhat lukewarm to the idea.





9:11 pm • Monday • April 5, 2010
For killing/destroying most things, you don’t really need nukulars.
USAF and USN have developed lots of easier ways to kill using modified precision guided conventional weapons instead of using irradiated ones. Thermobaric warheads (basically fuel air bomb + napalm), fuel air bombs and specially designed bunker busters. Most nations don’t have’em and don’t have the experience to use ‘em (unlike the US America in certain parts of the world cough Iraq cough.)
Plus nukulars and support systems are extremely expensive to maintain. Just a little point I read in “Dark Sun” (about the development of the hydrogen bomb), over half the US National Debt (before W) was generated due to the development, production and maintenance of said US America nukular arsenal including missiles, bombers, and subs.
This is why China has a mere 200 nukes and why India and Pakistan have only a few. Too expensive. This is what Iran is probably finding out right now.