Down and Out with the Healthcare Bill

While we applaud the Democrats’ historic victory Saturday night, our parochial concern with the rush to healthcare “reform” hasn’t changed: How much will it screw us over?
Some background, if you’ve never had the pleasure of working freelance: Neither party has ever given a shit about Americans who embody the American Dream by working for themselves.
If you’re a wage slave, you’re familiar with the Social Security/Medicare tax from your paycheck, which amounts to 7.65 percent. But that’s only half of the real tax — your employer pays the other half.
Self-employed? You have the distinct pleasure of paying both halves, or 15.3 percent — off the top, whether you earn $5,000 or $50,000. You can deduct half from your gross income, but you’re still on the hook for the percentage — which is the most fabulously regressive tax America offers, since it only applies up to $106,800 of income. If you’re wealthy, you end up paying less a portion of your income than the working poor. Even sales tax is more fair than that.
But we like using the coffeehouse as our office, so we can live with that. Beats waking up at the asscrack of dawn five days a week.
Still, there’s a significant risk to working freelance: There’s no way in hell you can afford health insurance. Not if you prefer to pay the rent. Those increasingly expensive (and employer-subsidized) group policies that are forcing the issue don’t hold a candle to what individuals face on the open market. Your only option is the one Alan Grayson parodies: Don’t get sick.
Thus, “reform”. Since we already pay a 2.9 percent tax for Medicare, we’d be more than happy to double it to provide Medicare for All, including ourselves. But that’s not on the table, since helping Americans like us to continue working for ourselves would be socialism.
Instead, depending on which version of the House and Senate bills you’re looking at, we’re faced with buying insurance that costs more than what the private market offers — or paying a 2.5 percent penalty for the pleasure of doing nothing. (The Congressional Budget Office estimates the Public Option would cost more than private insurance, since it would be saddled with higher-risk, hard-case leftovers from group policies.)
We did the math on Saturday: Buying insurance would cost ten times more (but see below) than paying the penalty. And for the good of the Republic — if what eventually emerges from the conference committee (if it ever makes it that far) actually helps a significant number of Americans — we’ll go along with it.
But please, don’t act like you’re doing us a favor. We’ll pay the penalty, but spare us the insult.
Update: Serolf Divad has found an online calculator that estimates your cost under the House or Senate bills. Including the subsidy, the Public Option would cost us about four times the penalty.





8:52 am • Monday • November 9, 2009
Or before said crack, “pre-crack” you might say.