<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3.5%, beeeeyotch!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/</link>
	<description>If it smells, we&#039;re on it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicago bureau</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-53568</link>
		<dc:creator>chicago bureau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-53568</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-53563&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nojo&lt;/a&gt;: Yeah.  What you said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-53563" rel="nofollow">nojo</a>: Yeah.  What you said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nojo</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-53563</link>
		<dc:creator>nojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-53563</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-53561&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vicenteduq&lt;/a&gt;: If you&#039;re just going to keep spamming us with boilerplate, self-serving links, and consonant-deprived domain names, I may have to take action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-53561" rel="nofollow">vicenteduq</a>: If you&#8217;re just going to keep spamming us with boilerplate, self-serving links, and consonant-deprived domain names, I may have to take action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicenteduq</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-53561</link>
		<dc:creator>vicenteduq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-53561</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;How Ronald Reagan was Immensely Superior to Today&#039;s Republicans - Without the Bigotry, Hate, Intolerance - Without the Dogmatism and Jingoism of Today&#039;s Republicans - Robert Schrum in TheWeek.com&lt;/b&gt;

Ronald Reagan had a gift for respecting political opponents, for being their friend and never diminish them. He had a heart of tolerance and respect for others. He wasn&#039;t and inquisitor and never used paranoia in politics against others.

TheWeek.com
The GOP dumps the Gipper
Mired in anger and vituperation, seemingly hell-bent on becoming asmall-tent faction rather than a big-tent governing party, Republicans have betrayed the leader they ritually canonize. The GOP is now the party of malaise.

By Robert Shrum
Shrum has been a senior adviser to the Gore 2000 presidential campaign, the campaign of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and the British Labour Party. In addition to being the chief strategist for the 2004 Kerry-Edwards campaign,
This is one of my most preferred Editorialists.
November 2, 2009

The GOP dumps the Gipper

http://www.theweek.com/bullpen/column/102355/The_GOP_dumps_the_Gipper

Some Excerpts :

Even while bending history in a different direction, Reagan more frequently quoted FDR and JFK than any conservative predecessor.
...................

Similarly, Reagan the enemy of government was a world-class deficit spender and pump primer. He gave lip service to balancing the budget, and called for a constitutional amendment to require it. But while he was assailing spending, he was spending away -- and the economy was growing. Today’s GOP, confronted with the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, robotically demands spending cuts. Reagan might have appreciated the rhetoric, but he never pursued the policy.

He was even more pragmatic on national security. When his intervention in Lebanon culminated in the bombing of the American barracks in Beirut and the death of 241 marines, he promptly withdrew. In 2009, the GOP is demanding massive troop escalation in Afghanistan without any consideration of the contours, merit or workability of the mission.

In his 1980 debate with Carter, Reagan had to reassure voters that he wasn’t trigger-happy -- and he pledged that yes, indeed, he would negotiate with the Soviets. He more than meant it. To the consternation of his own advisers, he proposed the abolition of nuclear weapons at a 1986 summit with Mikhail Gorbachev; to their relief, the idea foundered on the rocks of Reagan’s refusal to give up missile defense. Nonetheless, he persisted in his belief that he could negotiate a deal with the Soviet Union; the great Cold Warrior dispensed with his own certitudes to became a great peacemaker.

Today’s Republicans, by contrast, resist every negotiation. They contend that talking is a sign of weakness -- and that Obama is naïve to renew Reagan’s goal of nuclear disarmament. From Guantanamo to North Korea to Iran, the GOP is the party of Cheney, not Reagan.

&lt;b&gt;Watching the Political Circus from a Liberal Perspective of Youth and Minorities :&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://milenials.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Milenials.com&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Vicente Duque</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>How Ronald Reagan was Immensely Superior to Today&#8217;s Republicans &#8211; Without the Bigotry, Hate, Intolerance &#8211; Without the Dogmatism and Jingoism of Today&#8217;s Republicans &#8211; Robert Schrum in TheWeek.com</b></p>
<p>Ronald Reagan had a gift for respecting political opponents, for being their friend and never diminish them. He had a heart of tolerance and respect for others. He wasn&#8217;t and inquisitor and never used paranoia in politics against others.</p>
<p>TheWeek.com<br />
The GOP dumps the Gipper<br />
Mired in anger and vituperation, seemingly hell-bent on becoming asmall-tent faction rather than a big-tent governing party, Republicans have betrayed the leader they ritually canonize. The GOP is now the party of malaise.</p>
<p>By Robert Shrum<br />
Shrum has been a senior adviser to the Gore 2000 presidential campaign, the campaign of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and the British Labour Party. In addition to being the chief strategist for the 2004 Kerry-Edwards campaign,<br />
This is one of my most preferred Editorialists.<br />
November 2, 2009</p>
<p>The GOP dumps the Gipper</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theweek.com/bullpen/column/102355/The_GOP_dumps_the_Gipper" rel="nofollow">http://www.theweek.com/bullpen/column/102355/The_GOP_dumps_the_Gipper</a></p>
<p>Some Excerpts :</p>
<p>Even while bending history in a different direction, Reagan more frequently quoted FDR and JFK than any conservative predecessor.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Similarly, Reagan the enemy of government was a world-class deficit spender and pump primer. He gave lip service to balancing the budget, and called for a constitutional amendment to require it. But while he was assailing spending, he was spending away &#8212; and the economy was growing. Today’s GOP, confronted with the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, robotically demands spending cuts. Reagan might have appreciated the rhetoric, but he never pursued the policy.</p>
<p>He was even more pragmatic on national security. When his intervention in Lebanon culminated in the bombing of the American barracks in Beirut and the death of 241 marines, he promptly withdrew. In 2009, the GOP is demanding massive troop escalation in Afghanistan without any consideration of the contours, merit or workability of the mission.</p>
<p>In his 1980 debate with Carter, Reagan had to reassure voters that he wasn’t trigger-happy &#8212; and he pledged that yes, indeed, he would negotiate with the Soviets. He more than meant it. To the consternation of his own advisers, he proposed the abolition of nuclear weapons at a 1986 summit with Mikhail Gorbachev; to their relief, the idea foundered on the rocks of Reagan’s refusal to give up missile defense. Nonetheless, he persisted in his belief that he could negotiate a deal with the Soviet Union; the great Cold Warrior dispensed with his own certitudes to became a great peacemaker.</p>
<p>Today’s Republicans, by contrast, resist every negotiation. They contend that talking is a sign of weakness &#8212; and that Obama is naïve to renew Reagan’s goal of nuclear disarmament. From Guantanamo to North Korea to Iran, the GOP is the party of Cheney, not Reagan.</p>
<p><b>Watching the Political Circus from a Liberal Perspective of Youth and Minorities :</b></p>
<p><a href="http://milenials.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>Milenials.com</strong></a></p>
<p>Vicente Duque</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Original Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-53016</link>
		<dc:creator>Original Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-53016</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52967&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IanJ&lt;/a&gt;: 

It&#039;ll be a real knee-slapper if we have a W-shaped Depression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52967" rel="nofollow">IanJ</a>: </p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be a real knee-slapper if we have a W-shaped Depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rptrcub</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52987</link>
		<dc:creator>rptrcub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52987</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if channeling Clement Attlee might be needed right about now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if channeling Clement Attlee might be needed right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlyingChainSaw</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52981</link>
		<dc:creator>FlyingChainSaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52981</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not even close to terminal velocity, much less seeing real growth based on real industrial expansion and heading into anything that could be called prosperity. We&#039;re halfway through the first trough - the home real estate Ponzi meltdown and seeing the beginning of the credit card and commercial real estate meltdowns. The third trough - replacing the industrial base that was frittered away by Wall Street abuse will be the longest and the states&#039; management of which will determine if it has a future as an industrial and world power, not that the latter is a good thing necessarily but having a state department with commercial legates who answer the phone when you need them comes in handy on occasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not even close to terminal velocity, much less seeing real growth based on real industrial expansion and heading into anything that could be called prosperity. We&#8217;re halfway through the first trough &#8211; the home real estate Ponzi meltdown and seeing the beginning of the credit card and commercial real estate meltdowns. The third trough &#8211; replacing the industrial base that was frittered away by Wall Street abuse will be the longest and the states&#8217; management of which will determine if it has a future as an industrial and world power, not that the latter is a good thing necessarily but having a state department with commercial legates who answer the phone when you need them comes in handy on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodgerblue</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodgerblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52980</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52979&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;: Every politico in town was at the morning press conference near the synagogue.  The site is about 10 miles from where several people, including a Filipino-American mail carrier, were killed a few years ago by an anti-Semitic, racist wack job who has now, conveniently, recanted his ugly views from his prison cell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52979" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>: Every politico in town was at the morning press conference near the synagogue.  The site is about 10 miles from where several people, including a Filipino-American mail carrier, were killed a few years ago by an anti-Semitic, racist wack job who has now, conveniently, recanted his ugly views from his prison cell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranLefty</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52979</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52979</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52975&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dodgerblue&lt;/a&gt;: I thought &quot;North Hollywood&quot; was the less Valley-sounding way of describing southern Van Nuys. Hopefully this was an isolated incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52975" rel="nofollow">Dodgerblue</a>: I thought &#8220;North Hollywood&#8221; was the less Valley-sounding way of describing southern Van Nuys. Hopefully this was an isolated incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogenfreude</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52978</link>
		<dc:creator>blogenfreude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52978</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52968&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;al2o3cr&lt;/a&gt;: It&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/14/down-10000-market/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;already happened&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52968" rel="nofollow">al2o3cr</a>: It&#8217;s <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/14/down-10000-market/" rel="nofollow">already happened</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodgerblue</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/10/29/3-5-beeeeyotch/#comment-52975</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodgerblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=14987#comment-52975</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52971&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;redmanlaw&lt;/a&gt;: T/J:  2 people shot at a synagogue in Van Nuys, a suburb of Los Angeles right near where I grew up.  Shooter captured on security video is described by the cops as a &quot;male black.&quot;  Well, that narrows it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52971" rel="nofollow">redmanlaw</a>: T/J:  2 people shot at a synagogue in Van Nuys, a suburb of Los Angeles right near where I grew up.  Shooter captured on security video is described by the cops as a &#8220;male black.&#8221;  Well, that narrows it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

