<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Law Professor of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>If it smells, we&#039;re on it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:22:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nojo</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48293</link>
		<dc:creator>nojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48293</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;: Folks better get their Orly ya-yas out here. I&#039;ve found something more amusing for the morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48235" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>: Folks better get their Orly ya-yas out here. I&#8217;ve found something more amusing for the morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlyingChainSaw</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48249</link>
		<dc:creator>FlyingChainSaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48249</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48240&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;:  Ha! Love it! Chew the smegma off his nutsack, Natasha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48240" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>:  Ha! Love it! Chew the smegma off his nutsack, Natasha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nojo</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48241</link>
		<dc:creator>nojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48241</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;: Go right ahead. No telling where I&#039;m going with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48235" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>: Go right ahead. No telling where I&#8217;m going with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranLefty</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48240</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48240</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48237&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Just Jamie&lt;/a&gt;: 
My favorite part:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental  principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Take that, Orly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48237" rel="nofollow">Just Jamie</a>:<br />
My favorite part:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental  principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles.</p></blockquote>
<p>Take that, Orly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48237</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48237</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;:  What I loved most about that was a Saxby Chambliss nominated judge wrote that opinion.   He must be weeping at how he failed amurika.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48235" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>:  What I loved most about that was a Saxby Chambliss nominated judge wrote that opinion.   He must be weeping at how he failed amurika.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranLefty</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48235</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48235</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48234&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nojo&lt;/a&gt;: Okay, but can I be indulged to at least quote footnote 3 to give Stinquers a preview?

&lt;blockquote&gt;
3 
The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million.  See Federal Election Commission, Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements Dec. 31, 2008, http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608Pres/3_2008PresPrimaryCmpgnDis.pdf (last visited Sept. 15, 2009).  
Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. Press Release, Federal Election Commission, 2008 Presidential Campaign Financial Activity Summarized (June 8, 2009), available at http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608PresStat.shtml. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought.
Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.
See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of  378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961”).&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48234" rel="nofollow">nojo</a>: Okay, but can I be indulged to at least quote footnote 3 to give Stinquers a preview?</p>
<blockquote><p>
3<br />
The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million.  See Federal Election Commission, Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements Dec. 31, 2008, <a href="http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608Pres/3_2008PresPrimaryCmpgnDis.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608Pres/3_2008PresPrimaryCmpgnDis.pdf</a> (last visited Sept. 15, 2009).<br />
Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. Press Release, Federal Election Commission, 2008 Presidential Campaign Financial Activity Summarized (June 8, 2009), available at <a href="http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608PresStat.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608PresStat.shtml</a>. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought.<br />
Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.<br />
See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of  378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961”).</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nojo</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48234</link>
		<dc:creator>nojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48234</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48233&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SanFranLefty&lt;/a&gt;: Yeah, I&#039;m considering dwelling on that in the morning. No time to study it right now.

&lt;i&gt;(Also, I&#039;m waiting for WND to pick up on it. They usually post fresh stories at 9 p.m. Pacific.)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48233" rel="nofollow">SanFranLefty</a>: Yeah, I&#8217;m considering dwelling on that in the morning. No time to study it right now.</p>
<p><i>(Also, I&#8217;m waiting for WND to pick up on it. They usually post fresh stories at 9 p.m. Pacific.)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranLefty</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48233</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48233</guid>
		<description>Speaking of The Law, Stinque overlords, check the tip in-box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of The Law, Stinque overlords, check the tip in-box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranLefty</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48232</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranLefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48232</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-48225&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Capt Howdy&lt;/a&gt;: It&#039;s raining men!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-48225" rel="nofollow">Capt Howdy</a>: It&#8217;s raining men!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt Howdy</title>
		<link>http://www.stinque.com/2009/09/16/bad-law-professor-of-the-day/#comment-48225</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt Howdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stinque.com/?p=13134#comment-48225</guid>
		<description>theres a storm coming.  a gay storm.  and me without my umbrella.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres a storm coming.  a gay storm.  and me without my umbrella.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

